<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>AI on Sumner Evans</title><link>https://sumnerevans.com/tags/ai/</link><description>Recent content in AI on Sumner Evans</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 13:36:18 -0600</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sumnerevans.com/tags/ai/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Vibe Coding Doesn't Require LLMs</title><link>https://sumnerevans.com/posts/software-engineering/vibe-coding-doesnt-require-llms/</link><pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2025 06:25:00 -0600</pubDate><guid>https://sumnerevans.com/posts/software-engineering/vibe-coding-doesnt-require-llms/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I recently read
&lt;a
 href="https://alexkondov.com/i-know-when-youre-vibe-coding/"
 title="(opens in new tab)"
 rel="external" target="_blank"
 &gt;&lt;em&gt;I Know When You&amp;rsquo;re Vibe Coding&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
by &lt;a
 href="https://alexkondov.com/"
 title="(opens in new tab)"
 rel="external" target="_blank"
 &gt;Alex Kondov&lt;/a&gt; in which he described certain
characteristic &amp;ldquo;smells&amp;rdquo; of vibe-coded software. For example, he points to LLMs
proclivity to pave their own path and go against established patterns within a
project.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The article resonated with me, but I realized that it resonated with me at a
deeper level than just explaining my interactions with LLM-written software. I
realized that &lt;em&gt;I&amp;rsquo;ve seen these &amp;ldquo;smells&amp;rdquo; before in pre-LLM software (especially
that written by students).&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>